Subject: Re: [cube@cubidou.net: Re: Moving ethfoo in the main tree]
To: Hubert Feyrer <hubert@feyrer.de>
From: Quentin Garnier <cube@cubidou.net>
List: tech-kern
Date: 12/13/2004 13:50:23
--liOOAslEiF7prFVr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 01:16:14PM +0100, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Quentin Garnier wrote:
> >Using bridge(4) over two ethfoo(4) should work. It's actually an
> >interesting test to do, I'll try that by tonight.
> >
> >Making it possible for ethfoo to do bridging would introduce a lot of
> >complexity (it would have to know a lot about Ethernet).
>=20
> If "manual" bridge setup via bridge(4) would work, that'd be absolute ok.
> I have no idea what simh-vax does to get this all going.
I confirm it works as expected. And this is a case where using the
cloning device is less useful: creating the bridge and ethfoo
interfaces beforewards is much simpler.
--=20
Quentin Garnier - cube@cubidou.net - cube@NetBSD.org
"Commala-come-five! / Even when the shadows rise!
To see the world and walk the world / Makes ya glad to be alive."
Susannah's Song, The Dark Tower VI, Stephen King, 2004.
--liOOAslEiF7prFVr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)
iQEVAwUBQb2QD9goQloHrPnoAQKDjwf+Jf81aBaE+JK8BYybbAn1zplOGm3N9QyV
w/b18QnNpQQX/KijvRNz10mRXpdUbDj1NejF8+jNkhqVpmjo6elbi7dsEvlz7+yc
2RnYzlY2cnopxXlifYN7/FGXP0jW8X9q145xcDb5lIf4AbwWtvCyiXUeTFtcoqZE
xEGt8cckrMkB+jNX5BZaB0sMxbBvicz3GM9qCXfntCOZ6PnMZ4fVGIMFAXb/8KfS
LJQt+XlcIi0l2rUjf0/ZDYJkefq+API/RD2uQf8H8+5YEnLKbovOMzi0ij8JpiOP
VdzDLChCMC9S5KDJWQOSchk7zVQZjLPiKW8kR8E3+pm1tL2PqPyopQ==
=Vq2q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--liOOAslEiF7prFVr--