Subject: Re: [cube@cubidou.net: Re: Moving ethfoo in the main tree]
To: None <tech-kern@NetBSD.org>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@cs.uni-bonn.de>
List: tech-kern
Date: 12/13/2004 14:42:51
--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 01:16:14PM +0100, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Quentin Garnier wrote:
> >Using bridge(4) over two ethfoo(4) should work.  It's actually an
> >interesting test to do, I'll try that by tonight.
> >
> >Making it possible for ethfoo to do bridging would introduce a lot of
> >complexity (it would have to know a lot about Ethernet).
>=20
> If "manual" bridge setup via bridge(4) would work, that'd be absolute ok.
> I have no idea what simh-vax does to get this all going.

simh-vax on NetBSD uses bpf, and can't talk to the host machine, which is
why I always wanted to have something like ethfoo instead.

	-is

--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBQb2cWTCn4om+4LhpAQGE3Qf/d3FBH5c4NDSW/K9PCgZ8O0L3VutHzVO6
1vHcri8/3TU4vJoqeqLUsTIrUGmKCtKl6p6yyUzNKZCNPc2Fu/bzepnA9qr1J8WX
IC2vqfkLjJtoiheejsk/FGnlKkIRaoXkKCsuGp4vGlVfyiHNlHPaBHBNF91AyBcR
4CNqMiQVRAkCtFmr+wsY1xLUU+bnEu1gfWLNl9vFDPZCstoW1yXM8r8gRxEnuR0F
vnxYXDhsNQhJkuPPRuBCbgVXjjBcac89BodGh1znHyMPniegx9AbEe/WrHa+BTzb
kn/+vIfftakFu8OYP3sPzlrfFcGc/j4bw2dKwCuOwFwBfQS53dBGUw==
=zZGB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8--