--TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Dear Rui,

On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 05:43:51PM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
> | arch/pc532/fpu/ieee_handler.c
> | dist/pf/net/pf_table.c
> | dist/ipf/netinet/ip_compat.h
> | 
> | all define their own COPYIN() and COPYOUT() macro's.... now what to do?
> |    a) don't use COPYIN/COPYOUT but use IOCTL_COPYIN and IOCTL_COPYOUT ?
> |    b) patch somehow pc532/pf/ipf to not use such generic names?
> |    c) ...
> | 
> | (a) would do justice to the fact that they are only usable for IOCTL flags 
> | (b) might cause problems with importing newer pf/ipf or are those imports 
> | mainly scripted?
> | (c) other suggestions?
> 
> I vote for (a).
> For (b), you could change pc532, change ipf2netbsd script and create a new
> pf2netbsd script, but that's just too overhead for something that could be
> done easily with a name change.

true; but we do have to remember that it's name ought not be choosen too 
carelessly since its propably going to stay and porting of NetBSD stuff to 
other BSD's ought not to be compromised easily when it can be avoided.

Reinoud

--TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBQw4S3oKcNwBDyKpoAQIpGggArh5z/VOp5H0kUF7at1kRiIMVOgWd8ksw
FVjM3MSFoRODp6PJ3SAAQuBO4WpL1RvjlITDNzr2bVf1abyPJDQFbPv5TpxEkLdr
Q7J1pDCdD/o0N308G0srbAIJBpwyvf0n5Xy/TTXHMdjHngQ0SvBeTu49UOIU4iWG
OvOSKhsRrTfbOpbm5+FfsXr5YQQukYblW56zy7wDQk/A6fOwq76d14jHjf4gDbsU
oUaqDSL2e6OIxftg1zbGR9woZ5BtTLEenaAuz2dILX5g6217uxG6AEyV0IbVA4JO
5xi9s6cbvmRFcbbSBMW2Vr7U5yn+3JKbYdbJFVEYyELcIYM2xZdNFg==
=R8e0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu--