Subject: Re: splraiseipl()
To: None <plunky@rya-online.net>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
List: tech-kern
Date: 11/06/2005 00:40:30
> > IPL_* are the appropriate values to use, I think. IPL_xxx should
> > correspond directly to splxxx(), so there is no need for additional
> > constants that would basically be aliases of IPL_*.
>
> if that is so, then why is splraiseipl() necessary?
>
> iain
because it's the cleanest way i can think of
to parametrize IPLs in MI subsystems.
please suggest an alternative, if you have any better idea.
YAMAMOTO Takashi