Subject: Re: Proposal: eliminate all macros in the kernel
To: Thor Lancelot Simon <tls@rek.tjls.com>
From: Tonnerre LOMBARD <tonnerre@thundrix.ch>
List: tech-kern
Date: 11/20/2005 19:04:22
--fWddYNRDgTk9wQGZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Salut,
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 12:39:10PM -0500, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> One particular case I was wondering about was the queue.h macros. Their
> use is pervasive and they seem mostly harmless; changing them to inline
> functions would give us a major API difference from other BSDs for what
> seems like little reason. Thoughts?
I think that some of the macros can be turned into inlines without
constituting a particular change to the user, such as SLIST_REMOVE and
others that work alike.
However, some have to be kept intact by all means, such as
SLIST_FOREACH, STAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER, STAILQ_ENTRY and workalikes.
I remember doing something similar for Linux. No big deal. API
compliance can be taken care of.
Tonnerre
--fWddYNRDgTk9wQGZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFDgLqmXUVlAbfmNMIRAs5NAKDdtZpcaObqVA8xUHEIa9pdGuEYcgCfZqtx
rJ+CB/OVJVH4R3XIEUcDWws=
=V/ln
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--fWddYNRDgTk9wQGZ--