>> [...stuff re >2T filesystems...]
> Last I heard, you were trying this with 2.0 or some flaver there-of.
> If that is not so, please ignore what I'm about to say.

No, that is correct: it is 2.0, plus one patch from mycroft that fixed
a >1T issue.

> My understanding is that there were a number of 2 TB issues in the
> ffs code in 2.0, which have since been fixed.  I think you may have
> better luck trying with 3.0.

Okay, thanks.  I'll check with the other people involved and we'll kick
it around and decide whether we want to try 3.0 and see if it's any
better or just put it into production as two smaller filesystems - the
temporary space I referred to is getting pretty tight.

/~\ The ASCII				der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML	       mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B