Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 2006.01.06 14:06:54 -0500, Chapman Flack wrote:
> | Are there any current or contemplated NetBSD ports to
> | non-2s-complement machines?
> 
> No, I don't think so.

ok ... I wondered because I wasn't sure why bit_ffs in bitstring(3) is
done with a per-bit for loop, and thought maybe it meant 2s complement
techniques would be making too much of an architecture assumption.
Does anyone know of a reason not to use x^(x-1) in NetBSD code?

-Chap