Subject: Re: generic hook infrastructure
To: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>
From: Reinoud Zandijk <reinoud@netbsd.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 02/06/2006 14:32:03
--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Dear Bill,
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 09:01:07AM -0800, Bill Studenmund wrote:
> I'm not sure if this was being thought about for pfil. I think if we
> consider a fast-path case, it would make sense to have special, leaner
> list walkers. Like one with masking and unhook and one with neither.
I don't think that adding one `if' (or two) would make a difference in such
fast path's. Its propably allready done now too.
Cheers,
Reinoud
--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)
iQEVAwUBQ+dPy4KcNwBDyKpoAQKWUAgAqAKjWDvZqtX+7HXhf5MIOgGbpi4g3RX7
GZDkPn+NzShonm5c8E9YVNzFiETbfgBGUr84IJXgNX7DwUjRWAru3KQZpe8USD1o
YWKfvoVcqNpdWDZZ8Sv9LbL+936ZGKaipnz0IlfwKlxYxk5BAdHswses4rgZDt1I
8rwcE8twsuurz8T4OazRIHOqUizBV6iUWWb8kHSPEY+hZnkgU6bR1Pei/0cufLbq
Gy0Uc0Dq3b2XjKxCw+XktsrEK/d0mxa2qT58a1cQNl1+i7lHMmlTjn9sL82ZhQSk
8oEvyuykWeCXoiBNPbx3jv6qOLdhxsfvDHxpQR2OHS4ncrp1/fe8ZQ==
=smOc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l--