--QDIl5R72YNOeCxaP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline

Salut,

On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 04:37:53PM +0100, Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
> Ok, I could use some help here. I am encountering a really bizarre situation:

And it doesn't get less bizarre:

sc->maxcmd=1024 sc->ccblen=0x200 total=0x80000
i=0 ccb=0xcb39f000
i=1 ccb=0xcb3b2000
i=2 ccb=0xcb3c5000
i=3 ccb=0xcb3d8000
i=4 ccb=0xcb3eb000
i=5 ccb=0xcb3fe000
i=6 ccb=0xcb411000
i=7 ccb=0xcb424000 (which is larger than 0xcb39f000 + 0x80000)

By what stretch of logic is 0xcb39f000 + 7 * 0x200 equal to 0xcb424000?
In my sense of maths, that is 0xcb39fe00. Am I the only one who doesn't
see the logic here?

				Tonnerre

--QDIl5R72YNOeCxaP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (NetBSD)
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=9rrv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--QDIl5R72YNOeCxaP--