> > which type of comments are you talking about?
> 
> The cosmetic ones... what I'm doing now is just the first step of making
> everything work as it did, only with the kernel authorization framework.
> 
> That is why it may seem pointless to just replace suser() calls with
> something else that has exactly the same meaning, but in the future this
> will be easier to manage, be more consistent, and make sure all
> privileged operations are going through a single subsystem.
> 
> > any comments on the branch?
> 
> All feedback is encouraged, especially constructive one like your
> initial message -- a lot of the lock debugging was done after you
> pointed it out.

well, if you felt some of my comments were merely cosmetic and
not constructive, sorry.
but i made comments because i thought they were constructive.
after all, i don't think i can predict how you feel on each comments,
cosmetic or constructive.

YAMAMOTO Takashi