> > well, if you felt some of my comments were merely cosmetic and
> > not constructive, sorry.
> > but i made comments because i thought they were constructive.
> > after all, i don't think i can predict how you feel on each comments,
> > cosmetic or constructive.
> 
> As you can see, I applied most of your suggestions. But what I
> thought was irrelevant was the one wrt/suser() -- from my point of
> view it looks like I'm trying to change a lacking interface and you
> are requesting me to keep it anyway. :)

i don't see any lacks in suser as an interface, comparing with
KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER.

i'm not requesting you to keep suser (or KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER).
if an instance of them can be replaced with more appropriate KAUTH_SOMTHING,
it's fine.

ok, i'll shut up about this topic for now and see what you'll do. :-)

YAMAMOTO Takashi