Chapman Flack wrote:
>
>
> I suppose you'd want it unconditionally if you were including LKM
> support, just in case you later load a module that wants it.

This is where support like this could *itself* be an LKM, but we need
LKMs to be able to cross-link and express dependencies.  Our LKM support
just isn't there yet, IIUC.

    -- Garrett
>
> -Chap


-- 
Garrett D'Amore, Principal Software Engineer
Tadpole Computer / Computing Technologies Division,
General Dynamics C4 Systems
http://www.tadpolecomputer.com/
Phone: 951 325-2134  Fax: 951 325-2191