Subject: Re: metahook(9)
To: Elad Efrat <elad@NetBSD.org>
From: Martin Husemann <martin@duskware.de>
List: tech-kern
Date: 06/15/2006 11:04:54 
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 11:51:14AM +0200, Elad Efrat wrote:
> Okay, so metahook_inode_foo() becomes metahook_file_foo() and "ino_t
> inode" becomes "ino_t file"?

Is making this a fhandle_t* too expensive?

Martin