Subject: Re: why is setcontext(0) caught in kernel?
To: Klaus Klein <kleink@reziprozitaet.de>
From: Matthias Drochner <M.Drochner@fz-juelich.de>
List: tech-kern
Date: 08/03/2006 21:17:10 
kleink@reziprozitaet.de said:
> the idea was to keep NetBSD's implementation of setcontext(2) as close
> as possible to the SVR4 one

I've found that on both OSF/1 and Linux atexit(3) handlers
are executed at the end of a context chain.
So something must be different...

best regards
Matthias