Subject: Re: Moving scheduler semantics from cpu_switch() to kern_synch.c
To: Garrett D'Amore <garrett_damore@tadpole.com>
From: Daniel Sieger <dsieger@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
List: tech-kern
Date: 09/21/2006 20:22:16
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 10:01:06AM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
[snip]
>=20
> Yes, yes yes! I agree with all of it! So when can we do it? :-)
As I already noted to some other developers:
In order to get my work on the scheduler accepted as a part of my
studies I have to write a reasonably detailed outline for the
project. I think this could give us a good starting point to
coordinate our efforts. Once I'll have written a draft I'll make it
available somewhere. Afterwards we can adjust the outline with regard
to what is reaaly suitable, needed and wanted for the NetBSD
scheduler; especially with regard to what is within the scope of my
work, and what will have to be done later on.
regards,
Daniel
--=20
Daniel Sieger =20
Faculty of Technology
Bielefeld University
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (SunOS)
iD8DBQFFEthXJUKmeYzbnToRAhlAAKCEHYkWfvPfjzsPLWspEHBESrCdywCeJjb2
xtrL+RYlFQbqHWXIx6kWxwM=
=d8+D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5--