Subject: Re: subr_vmem.c supersedes subr_blist.c?
To: None <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
List: tech-kern
Date: 10/06/2006 08:51:06 
> Doesn't vmem(9) supersede the functionality in subr_blist.c?  If so,  
> the stuff that uses blists should be changed to use vmem, and  
> subr_blist.c deleted from the tree.
> 
> -- thorpej

uvm allocates a chunk of contiguous swap slots, and free them individually.
it can't be handled by vmem.

YAMAMOTO Takashi