> YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> >>> what you are proposing seems like another kind of open/close to me.
> >>> VOP_OPEN and VOP_CLOSE are appropriate ways to handle them.
> >>>
> >>> YAMAMOTO Takashi
> >> can you explain what VOP_OPEN() should we add flags to in case of swap
> >> device or raidframe? I'm not sure I follow your logic just yet...
> >>
> >> -e.
> > 
> > in the case of swap, the one in swap_on().  i'm not sure about raidframe.
> > 
> > YAMAMOTO Takashi
> 
> raidframe can be a problem with your approach I'm afraid.

why it isn't a problem with yours?

YAMAMOTO Takashi