Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp> wrote:
> How about the following (still rough) categorization?
Well, you have listed all manuals. The general intention is to list only
abstract-manuals. But while we still haven't all abstract-manuals in man9, it
probably would be OK.

> * VM system
>  cpu_swapout, pmap, uvm
> 
> * memory management
>  kmem_alloc, kmem_free, kmem_zalloc, memoryallocators, pool,
>  pool_cache, vmem, vmem_alloc, vmem_create, vmem_destroy,
>  vmem_free, vmem_xalloc, vmem_xfree
IMHO, these should be merged. And leave only memoryallocators(9) (it's a
general description), uvm (9), pmap(9). And seems cpu_swapout(9), which is
without place :)

> * process control
>  cpu_exit, cpu_switch, cpu_idle, cpu_lwp_fork, ctxsw, curproc,
>  do_setresuid, fork1, ltsleep, need_resched, preempt, scheduler,
>  setrunqueue, signal, suspendsched, userret
While scheduler(9) and others (there should be something like dispatcher(9) )
is not yet improved, it would be OK.

> * file system
>  dofileread, extattr, file, fileassoc, filedesc, fisetown, fstrans,
>  namecache, namei, pathname, vattr, vfs, vfs_hooks, vfsops, vfssubr,
>  vnfileops, vnode, vnodeops, vnsubr
We don't need so much, only general ones. See patch.
Same to networking and other categories.

The rest looks really good for me. At least while we don't have
abstract-manuals :)

-- 
Best regards,
Mindaugas
www.NetBSD.org