Bucky Katz wrote:

> Andrew Doran <ad@netbsd.org> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 02:45:28PM -0800, Bucky Katz wrote:
> >
> >> I dunno. #ifdefing out the "new scheduling infrastructure" should be
> >> just as easy as #ifdefing in the SA code.
> >> 
> >> Not seeing a problem here.
> >
> > Sorry, but 1:1 threading is not going away. As others have pointed
> > out, if you need stability then you automatically need to use a
> > release branch of NetBSD. That is our stated position, and it's
> > plain as day:
> 
> I don't recall anybody asking for 1:1 to 'go away'. I merely asked for
> you to honor a goal you'd previously stated.

Did you read all of Andy's message from about half an hour ago where he
explained why he changed this goal?  Goals are allowed to change...

Simon.