Subject: Re: Please Revert newlock2
To: None <tech-kern@netbsd.org>
From: Bucky Katz <bucky@picovex.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 02/21/2007 13:43:42
Lars Heidieker <lars@heidieker.de> writes:

> Maybe I am missing the point, but from a user perspective you would
> want descent threading, scalable over multiply cpus, this is what
> the 1:1 threading approach can deliver but here the m:n failed and
> it's unlikely to be fixed because off the complexity.

Our application runs on a uniprocessor.