Subject: Re: Missile launchers vs uhid
To: Stephen Borrill <netbsd@precedence.co.uk>
From: Reinoud Zandijk <reinoud@netbsd.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 02/28/2007 16:27:44
--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 02:59:25PM +0000, Stephen Borrill wrote:
> I've got a USB missile launcher:
> uhidev0 at uhub0 port 4 configuration 1 interface 0
> uhidev0: vendor 0x1130 Tenx Nonstandard Devic, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2,
> iclass 3/0
> uhid0 at uhidev0: input=0, output=64, feature=8
> uhidev1 at uhub0 port 4 configuration 1 interface 1
> uhidev1: vendor 0x1130 Tenx Nonstandard Devic, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2,
> iclass 3/0
> uhid1 at uhidev1: input=0, output=8, feature=0
> ...
> They both claim the device directly and try to detach the kernel uhid
> driver before writing a very simple usb control message. This seems a lot
> simpler than messing around with libusbhid, but I can't see how to achieve
> it on NetBSD.
Is it not a bug in the usbhid code then or is the device a non standard
USB?
Reinoud
--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (NetBSD)
iQEVAwUBReWfaIKcNwBDyKpoAQIzAQf8CA8jDXgvHfvyN2l+WetkqkW8GF/o6k1f
JAdq7qPlm/nmEa/xMUW0kVTdKENK53rJSnYeBWvk/7SsoEHhKqUtURTRgDreKJtF
36d19Er26uIGaUKVVa/VmJQ35Q2u+VoxuEMQa8/SMyNBicrs7poqhtOnXgthgrg0
6nByCcG1EIDmEXHIWdkGrVNRpsoLK4D1B8pz/MDhe3jEs1a5yZ2FAf233Jr+EM0z
YOuxDYZsURkoTOFVuDm7Ndi5EpDwWDGGkKTeY4yT3df6p+zr2UahwN6161TB7lr8
y+Gm1+Yd+v/Hf0O1zHBRl+ovfQ1J9M7EdfN0FKdlIXQzB/NJ5SMylg==
=DJmq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+--