Andrew Doran <ad@netbsd.org> wrote:
> On the subject of priority levels, here is one suggestion and some notes:
> 
> 160 - 191       Interrupt (32)
> 96 - 160        Real time (64)
> 64 - 95         Kernel (32)
> 0 - 63          User (64)

Can we reach a consensus on this topic?

As I understand, we all agree that inversion of priority levels (highest <->
lowest) is a good thing. Any objections for doing this modification?

-- 
Best regards,
Mindaugas
www.NetBSD.org