>> Note: this is not correct.  While I do not question the idea that it
>> could be EXCRUCIATINGLY PAINFUL to use either an ffs1 or ffs2 file
>> system for a multi-TB file system, it can be done.

I think that characterization is a bit inaccurate.

At work we're using ffs1 for a filesystem just epsilon under 2T (it's a
1k/8k filesystem; we'd make it bigger except the RAID card it's on
doesn't support logical drives >2T), and it works fine.  What do you
expect to be "EXCRUCIATINGLY PAINFUL" about it?

/~\ The ASCII				der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML	       mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B