Haai,

On Thu, June 7, 2007 16:21, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
>>[snip]
>
> Feel free to look at the NetBSD source tree any time you like, and see
> the code to handle GPT partition tables.

You really don't have the slightest idea of what I'm saying, do you?
You're asking for disadvantages, but ignore those that have been put up by
me (and the solutions thereto), instead replying with a flame.

>
> This is the way NetBSD is going. Ranting and raving isn't going to change
> that, and this conversation has long served any useful purpose it might
> have -- except that you keep trying to confuse reasonable people like
> Johnny, and, unfortunately, it would be rude of us to let them suffer
> under the burden of your confusion.

'Keep trying to confuse'?! My vision is crystal-clear, as opposed to what
I've seen in your messages. The latter seem to be based purely on
conjecture with some logic thrown in where it would become too obvious for
others.

Note: following statement cp'ed out of context. See above.
> This is the way NetBSD is going.

Do what you think is necessary. However, I will not go with it. I'll try
my luck with some of the other BSDs, and, failing that, I will fork one of
the projects (most likely this one or OpenBSD).

This whole state of affairs is way too primitive for my liking. Get a clue
-- thanks.

Baai,

De Zeurkous
-----------

Friggin' Machines!

>
> Thor
>