Subject: Re: FYI: ENVSYS 2 ready
To: None <tech-kern@netbsd.org>
From: Valeriy E. Ushakov <uwe@stderr.spb.ru>
List: tech-kern
Date: 06/21/2007 13:55:54
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:08:19 +0200, Juan RP wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:02:44 +0900
> "Masao Uebayashi" <uebayasi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I don't like struct tables are put in headers.
>
> What do you suggest then? I need those available for at least three
> components: sysmon_envsys.c, sysmon_envsys_events.c and envstat.c.
Yes, tables in headers is totally wrong. Also, think about l10n on
messages for envstat(8), for which such static tables are not enough.
SY, Uwe
--
uwe@stderr.spb.ru | Zu Grunde kommen
http://snark.ptc.spbu.ru/~uwe/ | Ist zu Grunde gehen