Subject: Re: FYI: ENVSYS 2 ready
To: Valeriy E. Ushakov <uwe@stderr.spb.ru>
From: Juan RP <juan@xtrarom.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 06/21/2007 11:57:33
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:55:54 +0400
"Valeriy E. Ushakov" <uwe@stderr.spb.ru> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:08:19 +0200, Juan RP wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:02:44 +0900
> > "Masao Uebayashi" <uebayasi@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I don't like struct tables are put in headers.
> >
> > What do you suggest then? I need those available for at least three
> > components: sysmon_envsys.c, sysmon_envsys_events.c and envstat.c.
>
> Yes, tables in headers is totally wrong. Also, think about l10n on
> messages for envstat(8), for which such static tables are not enough.
I'm fixing it... I'm just testing the changes now.
--
Juan Romero Pardines - The NetBSD Project
http://plog.xtrarom.org - NetBSD/pkgsrc news in Spanish