2007/7/11, YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>:
> > Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au> wrote:
> > > As well as the instance examples from freebsd, we've talked before
> > > about per-cpu workqueues each with a cpu-bound lwp processing jobs
> > > from it, for running things like est frequency changes.
> > >
> > > If you wanted to run something on all cpu's, you could either insert a
> > > task on all those queues, or arrange for the task to run on the first,
> > > and add itself to the next cpu's workqueue each time, depending on the
> > > nature of what you wanted to run.
> > Since kthreads could be per-CPU, workqueue(9) interface could be adopted too.
> > I am not sure about having some per-CPU kthreads (created at mi_cpu_attach())
> > as general worker-threads - would this be reasonable?
> >
> > http://www.netbsd.org/~rmind/workqueue.diff  (not tested)
> > Comments?
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Mindaugas
> > www.NetBSD.org
>
> Trying 204.152.190.12...
> Requesting http://www.netbsd.org/~rmind/workqueue.diff
> ftp: Error retrieving file - `404 Not Found'
>
> YAMAMOTO Takashi
>
Try http://www.netbsd.org/~rmind/workqueue-2.diff

Zafer.