Hi!


From: darkstar@city-net.com
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:14:48 -0400

> Quoting KIYOHARA Takashi <kiyohara@kk.iij4u.or.jp>:
> > I tried your slhci(4). As a result, umass(4) seems to operate enough.
> > Because my environment is bad, it is not possible to test it though
> > zyd(4) seems to operate, too.
> > 
> > And, I know 'slhci(4) at intio(4)' + ural(4) and umass(4) operated on
> > x68k.  I think that I should replace our slhci(4). 
> > ^^^^
> > Do we have the problem?
> 
>   Thanks for testing.  isaki@ tested one version on x68k that had a bug, and
> has
> not had a chance to test with that bug corrected.  What revision chip do you
> have?  The x68k board uses revision 1.2, but the Ratoc card is revision 1.5.


I have Ratoc CFU1.  dmesg(8) was told as follows.

  slhci0 at pcmcia0 function 0: <RATOC, USB HOST CF+ Card>
  slhci0: ScanLogic SL811HS/T USB Host Controller  (rev 1.4 or 1.5)
  slhci0: Max Current 100 mA (value by code, not by probe)


Thanks,
--
kiyohara