At Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:20:29 +0900 (JST),
KIYOHARA Takashi wrote:
> > > I tried your slhci(4). As a result, umass(4) seems to operate enough.
> > > Because my environment is bad, it is not possible to test it though
> > > zyd(4) seems to operate, too.
> > > 
> > > And, I know 'slhci(4) at intio(4)' + ural(4) and umass(4) operated on
> > > x68k.  I think that I should replace our slhci(4). 
> > > ^^^^
> > > Do we have the problem?
> > 
> >   Thanks for testing.  isaki@ tested one version on x68k that had a bug, and
> > has
> > not had a chance to test with that bug corrected.  What revision chip do you
> > have?  The x68k board uses revision 1.2, but the Ratoc card is revision 1.5.
> 
> 
> I have Ratoc CFU1.  dmesg(8) was told as follows.
> 
>   slhci0 at pcmcia0 function 0: <RATOC, USB HOST CF+ Card>
>   slhci0: ScanLogic SL811HS/T USB Host Controller  (rev 1.4 or 1.5)
>   slhci0: Max Current 100 mA (value by code, not by probe)

Can anyone test the patch on newer Nereid USB board of x68k?
Newer Nereid has rev 1.4 or 1.5, but mine is an initial lot
which has rev 1.2.
---
Tetsuya Isaki <isaki@par.odn.ne.jp / isaki@NetBSD.org>