Subject: Re: nameidata in VFS_MOUNT
To: Antti Kantee <pooka@cs.hut.fi>
From: Bill Stouder-Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 07/31/2007 12:49:55
--n/aVsWSeQ4JHkrmm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 10:31:32PM +0300, Antti Kantee wrote:
> On Tue Jul 31 2007 at 12:24:54 -0700, Bill Stouder-Studenmund wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 06:48:29PM +0300, Antti Kantee wrote:
> > > Would anyone cry if the nameidata parameter in VFS_MOUNT() had an
> > > unfortunate "accident" and went missing?  It's currently totally unus=
ed
> > > (if you don't count storage space abuse by the callees).
> >=20
> > Does cvs blame say anything about it?
>=20
> 386bsd, no use (other than storage abuse) in ufs or nfs.  Those are
> naturally the first places I checked before bothering the list.

Probably kill it then. If we ever find we need it, we'll put it back.

Take care,

Bill

--n/aVsWSeQ4JHkrmm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFGr5JjWz+3JHUci9cRArhXAJwKnlOvY5+CiQ5HNZsccc5VqpmOJwCdHmhX
HBEg9pKiiir9p4XhU8xomEc=
=qARB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--n/aVsWSeQ4JHkrmm--