Subject: Re: Syscall number space
To: None <tls@rek.tjls.com>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 08/26/2007 21:27:49
On Aug 26, 2007, at 8:29 PM, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> Because that's the currently configured limit in syscalls.master.
The only reason that's set like that was to make the number of system
call slots a power of two (512 happened to be the closest power of
two). Making it a power of two enables some optimizations in the low-
level system call handler.
There is no harm in simply making it 1024 (aside from some wasted
space).
-- thorpej