Subject: Re: Refactoring MI devices in GENERIC and friends
To: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
From: Michael Lorenz <macallan@netbsd.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 09/08/2007 19:20:47
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On Sep 8, 2007, at 17:55, matthew green wrote:
>> i think i like this.. i like pooka's config -f idea.
>>
>> one problem i'm aware of is that many "MI" drivers are not truly
>> MI and don't compile everywhere. eg, there are several network
>> devices that are not available on sparc64 due to this. see
>> sparc64/conf/GENERIC for details...
>
> Why didn't anyone fox that? Another case of right hardware not in
> right
> hands?
>
>
> basically.. in some cases, these are 10mbit ethernet cards or
> other poor 100mbit cards that don't compare to onboard at all,
> so the desire to care is very, very low :)
Eh, I guess few would bother with an ne if there's a hme onboard ;)
( although ne at pci works at least on macppc so chances are pretty
good it would work on sparc(64) as well )
have fun
Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iQEVAwUBRuMuT8pnzkX8Yg2nAQLWqgf9FdygmUAYIfLK1LKDs7DnrqYmw3CIsoBq
diis7WBeNqw8VsE75ODXTT2b3Qf2eBZnpI2giOt1y9NkWzzjP5yLT8rHPb7vUH0q
t0cve1QexRLl8nKe+7oKxjxYie3mW7BYi4ng8r9VHlkWL9mXHxvJrbF2Q2mSIsZg
EppI8Qg5SHEUcc5X1G7KmLAkFE8hOfiyQWfMolctt6RriAEluUwuvGua/DVy0cAW
/teQ+HnJ2SNSKe04a98Qr+/LNgNa6sHzFLcCFriTMV0lbHN7h8vJlzcQlga/tPF2
4rS9fO1K7yl6uFeCe2UZfXrJCiCVVJjoDILCWrG/ABmBJO7T+CET6g==
=GAiA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----