tech-kern: Re: killing the "l" argument from vfs

Subject: Re: killing the "l" argument from vfs
To: None <christos@zoulas.com>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
List: tech-kern
Date: 11/26/2007 08:00:04

> On Nov 25,  6:47pm, pooka@cs.hut.fi (Antti Kantee) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: killing the "l" argument from vfs
> 
> | Can you be a bit more specific about what you mean?  Do you mean if NFS
> | would need it in componentname now or in the future due to iothreads?
> 
> In componentname now... I haven't thought about iothreads.
> 
> christos

i believe cn_lwp should die as well.

YAMAMOTO Takashi