Re: Make condition variables take absolute wakeup time

To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost>
Subject: Re: Make condition variables take absolute wakeup time
From: Andrew Doran <ad%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 12:20:39 +0100

On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 11:14:04PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:

> > This is for PR kern/38554. I have compiled it but not tested it yet.
> > Also, it doesn't handle kpause() but should. Any comments?
> > 
> > http://www.netbsd.org/~ad/condvar.diff
> > 
> > Andrew
> 
> aren't -EWOULDBLOCK and -EINVAL valid clock_t values?

For a sleep ~497 days into the future at 100Hz, yes. Perhaps uint64_t would
be better.

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Make condition variables take absolute wakeup time
  - From: YAMAMOTO Takashi

References:
- Make condition variables take absolute wakeup time
  - From: Andrew Doran
- Re: Make condition variables take absolute wakeup time
  - From: YAMAMOTO Takashi

Prev by Date: Re: ld(4) shutdown/flush patch to avoid tsleep at system shutdown time
Next by Date: [RFC][ARM32] Time running bug in the NetBSD time network
Previous by Thread: Re: Make condition variables take absolute wakeup time
Next by Thread: Re: Make condition variables take absolute wakeup time
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index