Re: porting ZFS

[Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%rek.tjls.com@localhost>]

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 09:21:23AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 06:21:48PM -0700, Brian Buhrow wrote:
> > 1.  With NetBSD acting as an ISCSI target, giving NetBSD the ability to
> > provide large amounts of storage  to serve via that mechanism would be very
> > useful.
> 
> That's much better served by the LVM work, IMO.

I don't understand why a logical volume manager that requires a pile of
GPLed code for practical use is a better alternative for this than zpool.

-- 
Thor Lancelot Simon                                        
tls%rek.tjls.com@localhost
    "Even experienced UNIX users occasionally enter rm *.* at the UNIX
     prompt only to realize too late that they have removed the wrong
     segment of the directory structure." - Microsoft WSS whitepaper