tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Proposal: B_ARRIER (addresses wapbl performance?)



On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 07:06:37PM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 06:43:44PM -0400, der Mouse wrote:
> > > I'd like to propose a new buffer flag, B_ARRIER.
> > 
> > I'd suggest B_BARRIER.
> 
> I suppose you're right. :-)

I agree, but I wasn't going to talk about naming :)

> > > "Even experienced UNIX users occasionally enter rm *.* at the UNIX
> > >  prompt only to realize too late that they have removed the wrong
> > >  segment of the directory structure." - Microsoft WSS whitepaper
> > 
> > I find that particularly amusing because I can't recall ever running
> > "rm *.*" even deliberately; removing everything with a dot in its name
> > and nothing else is...not a common operation for me.  (Now, if they'd
> > said "rm -f *".... :-)
> 
> Well, yes.  It immediately struck me that way, too.  But you're, so far,
> the only other person who seems to think so...

That was the whole point of the quote to me, too - the author clearly
didn't know Unix the way he was pretending. 

--
Dan.

Attachment: pgpM2a4BHQdvG.pgp
Description: PGP signature



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index