Re: Analyzing a 4.0/amd64 panic

[Edgar Fuß <ef%math.uni-bonn.de@localhost>]

> Except that it got changed after 4.0 was branched :-(
Hm.

> That isn't the correct interpretation of the saved registers.
> In particular eflags cannot be zero - which is a very good hint,
> r14 looks more like a possible eflags value.
Oops. So the entire analysis may be wrong?

> What are labelled as rbp and r15 look like code addresses, rsp might be valid.
"might be"? Looks like I'm going to have lots of fun.

> The stack will look much like an i386 one
The stacks I used to know are 6502 and ARM2.

> Finding where it is called from in the source ...
Ah, I understand, thanks.