Re: proposal for bus_dma(9) change

[Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>]

Christoph_Egger%gmx.de@localhost wrote:

> You're right, both solutions have maintenance costs. IMO, bus_dma(9)
> is a lot cheaper in the long run.

If you are focusing only x86?

MI drivers could be maintained and fixed by all people who use it,
but unfortunately MD implementation often has quite less man power.

Fixing MI drivers will make more benefit in the long run.
---
Izumi Tsutsui