Re: UVM typedef struct

[seebs%seebs.net@localhost (Peter Seebach)]

In message <20090616053752.GA8944%cs.hut.fi@localhost>, Antti Kantee writes:
>1) obfuscates code.  there is no reason to tell if silly_t is an int,
>   struct or pointer to something just by looking at the type

This is not necessarily a bad thing.  It is sometimes unimportant to know
what the type is, as long as you know the interface provided for using it.

>2) impossible to provide forward declarations for interfaces using
>   silly_t

?

int foo(silly_t);

-s