tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: NiLFS(2) import

To: David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: NiLFS(2) import
From: Mark Weinem <mark.weinem%alumni.uni-due.de@localhost>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:31:08 +0200

David Holland wrote:

> No, not particularly, any more than adding ext2fs was a step toward
> removing ffs, or adding ext3fs would be a step toward removing WAPBL.

Why do we want to keep LFS when we have NiLFS? 
Who maintains LFS?


Best, Mark

Follow-Ups:
- Re: NiLFS(2) import
  - From: David Holland
- Re: NiLFS(2) import
  - From: haad

References:
- NiLFS(2) import
  - From: Reinoud Zandijk
- Re: NiLFS(2) import
  - From: Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
- Re: NiLFS(2) import
  - From: David Holland

Prev by Date: Re: Syscalls documentation and librt
Next by Date: Re: NiLFS(2) import
Previous by Thread: Re: NiLFS(2) import
Next by Thread: Re: NiLFS(2) import
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index