Re: Bug in mutex_owned() ?

[Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <rmind%netbsd.org@localhost>]

Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky%c2i.net@localhost> wrote:
>    39 static __inline int
>    40 __SIMPLELOCK_LOCKED_P(__cpu_simple_lock_t *__ptr)
>    41 {
>    42         return *__ptr == __SIMPLELOCK_LOCKED;
>    43 }
> 
>    72 #define __SIMPLELOCK_LOCKED     1
>    73 #define __SIMPLELOCK_UNLOCKED   0
> 
> mutex_owned() == 1 for spin locks ???

Yes, it is a comparison.  Which is correct for the purpose.

-- 
Mindaugas