Re: Improving RAIDframe Parity Handling: The Diff

[Jed Davis <jld%panix.com@localhost>]

On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 03:37:35PM +0100, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:48:03PM -0500, Jed Davis wrote:
> > So it sounds like everyone who's tested this patch wants me to commit
> > it.  It looks like all the issues raised here are better dealt with as
> > separate commits (being either nontrivial or "no functional change
> > intended"), so I'll commit the patch I posted (the -1103 one), after
> > giving a heads-up to current-users.
> 
> Are there plans to get this into NetBSD 5.1 as well?
> (given that people have succesfully tested this on netbsd-5)

In a word, yes: http://releng.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/req-5.cgi?show=1187

-- 
(let ((C call-with-current-continuation)) (apply (lambda (x y) (x y)) (map
((lambda (r) ((C C) (lambda (s) (r (lambda l (apply (s s) l))))))  (lambda
(f) (lambda (l) (if (null? l) C (lambda (k) (display (car l)) ((f (cdr l))
(C k)))))))    '((#\J #\d #\D #\v #\s) (#\e #\space #\a #\i #\newline)))))