Re: envsys issues [was Re: envstat wrong: who's at fault?]

To: tech-kern%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: envsys issues [was Re: envstat wrong: who's at fault?]
From: der Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:12:12 -0400 (EDT)

>> [...]
> This is greatly cleaned up in the envsysV2 implementation.

>> [...]
> In envsysV2, a single call is used [...]

Then there's not really anything to discuss, because it's all already
been fixed.  Excellent.

/~\ The ASCII                             Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML                mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

References:
- envsys issues [was Re: envstat wrong: who's at fault?]
  - From: der Mouse
- Re: envsys issues [was Re: envstat wrong: who's at fault?]
  - From: Paul Goyette

Prev by Date: Re: envsys issues [was Re: envstat wrong: who's at fault?]
Next by Date: Re: RFC: device flavours
Previous by Thread: Re: envsys issues [was Re: envstat wrong: who's at fault?]
Next by Thread: dk_rawlock and vn_close
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index