tech-kern by date

Last updated: Sun Aug 04 15:53:08 2013
Messages in reverse chronological order
Timezone is UTC

Page 1 of 2011/07
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]

TimeSubject# followupsFrom
Sun, 31 Jul 2011
23:36 Re: Adding linux_link(2) system call, second round (1) David Holland
22:49 Re: Adding linux_link(2) system call, second round (2) Joerg Sonnenberger
21:35 Re: Adding linux_link(2) system call, second round (1) Roland C. Dowdeswell
21:22 Re: Adding linux_link(2) system call, second round (0) Christos Zoulas
18:37 Re: Adding linux_link(2) system call, second round (2) Christos Zoulas
18:14 kcpuset(9) interface (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
18:12 exec and VM_MAP_TOPDOWN - chicken & egg? (0) Martin Husemann
17:40 Adding linux_link(2) system call, second round (4) Emmanuel Dreyfus
Sat, 30 Jul 2011
10:45 Re: pchb@acpi (1) Manuel Bouyer
07:54 Re: Etymology of 'softc' (0) Adam Hoka
02:37 Re: Adding linux_link(2) system call (Was: Re: lin (0) Mouse
02:10 Re: Adding linux_link(2) system call (0) David Holland
Fri, 29 Jul 2011
22:53 Re: Adding linux_link(2) system call (Was: Re: lin (1) Rhialto
22:44 Re: Etymology of 'softc' (1) Greg Troxel
21:39 Re: Etymology of 'softc' (0) Allen Briggs
21:21 Etymology of 'softc' (2) Adam Hoka
18:41 Re: Adding linux_link(2) system call (1) Emmanuel Dreyfus
18:10 Re: pchb@acpi (0) Matthias Drochner
17:42 Re: pchb@acpi (0) Matthias Drochner
17:32 Re: pchb@acpi (2) David Young
16:44 Re: Adding linux_link(2) system call (Was: Re: lin (1) Steven Bellovin
16:28 Re: Adding linux_link(2) system call (Was: Re: lin (0) Mouse
16:12 Re: Adding linux_link(2) system call (Was: Re: lin (2) Mouse
15:38 Re: Adding linux_link(2) system call (1) Greg Troxel
15:30 Re: Adding linux_link(2) system call (Was: Re: lin (1) David Holland
15:17 Re: Adding linux_link(2) system call (Was: Re: lin (1) Mouse
15:09 Re: link(2) on a symlink to a directory fails (0) Mouse
15:02 Re: Adding linux_link(2) system call (Was: Re: lin (1) David Holland
14:20 Adding linux_link(2) system call (Was: Re: link(2) (2) Emmanuel Dreyfus
11:10 Re: link(2) on a symlink to a directory fails (2) Greg Troxel
09:23 Re: link(2) on a symlink to a directory fails (0) Rhialto
08:12 link(2) on a symlink to a directory fails (2) Emmanuel Dreyfus
07:24 Re: pchb@acpi (2) Martin Husemann
Thu, 28 Jul 2011
20:14 Re: pchb@acpi (1) David Young
16:17 Re: rsync very slow with current kernel (select is (0) Manuel Bouyer
03:36 Re: rfc: vmem(9) API/implementation changes (0) David Holland
Wed, 27 Jul 2011
18:27 Re: rfc: vmem(9) API/implementation changes (0) Martin Husemann
18:06 Re: rfc: vmem(9) API/implementation changes (0) Lars Heidieker
17:58 Re: rfc: vmem(9) API/implementation changes (1) Eduardo Horvath
17:57 Re: rfc: vmem(9) API/implementation changes (0) David Young
17:48 Re: rsync very slow with current kernel (select is (0) Mouse
17:35 Re: rsync very slow with current kernel (select is (1) Michael L. Hitch
17:28 Re: rfc: vmem(9) API/implementation changes (2) David Young
17:11 Re: rfc: vmem(9) API/implementation changes (2) David Laight
16:58 Re: rfc: vmem(9) API/implementation changes (2) Eduardo Horvath
16:49 rfc: vmem(9) API/implementation changes (1) David Young
16:32 rsync very slow with current kernel (select issue? (3) Manuel Bouyer
04:13 Re: Query regarding adding physical memory after u (0) Masao Uebayashi
Tue, 26 Jul 2011
05:45 Re: RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot( (0) Jukka Ruohonen
Mon, 25 Jul 2011
16:09 Possible fix for port-xen/45158 (0) Roger Pau Monné
06:23 Mapping Linux extended attribute namespaces (0) Emmanuel Dreyfus
Sun, 24 Jul 2011
13:26 re: "strict" weak aliases (0) matthew green
Sat, 23 Jul 2011
20:57 Re: RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot( (0) Joerg Sonnenberger
19:16 Re: RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot( (1) Aleksey Cheusov
18:36 Re: RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot( (1) Aleksey Cheusov
14:18 Re: Dutch keymap not imported into NetBSD :p (0) gilbert . fernandes
11:20 Re: sysctl_createv: sysctl_create(no_sa_support) r (0) Peter Tworek
07:38 Re: Dutch keymap not imported into NetBSD :p (1) Adam Hoka
00:24 Re: fcntl() F_GETLK semantics vs. test t_vnops.c (0) Alexander Nasonov
Fri, 22 Jul 2011
23:53 Re: sysctl_createv: sysctl_create(no_sa_support) r (1) Jean-Yves Migeon
21:45 Re: Multiple device attachments (0) Mouse
21:22 Re: Multiple device attachments (0) Eduardo Horvath
20:58 Re: Multiple device attachments (2) Frank Zerangue
20:30 Re: UDL driver X11 support (0) Piotr Adamus
20:18 Re: UDL driver X11 support (1) Michael
19:35 sysctl_createv: sysctl_create(no_sa_support) retur (1) Peter Tworek
18:55 bug #44412 (2) David Riley
17:20 Re: Dutch keymap not imported into NetBSD :p (0) gilbert . fernandes
17:18 Re: Dutch keymap not imported into NetBSD :p (0) tlaronde
17:08 Re: Dutch keymap not imported into NetBSD :p (2) Paul Koning
17:07 Re: Multiple device attachments (1) Eduardo Horvath
17:05 Re: Dutch keymap not imported into NetBSD :p (2) gilbert . fernandes
13:50 Re: UDL driver X11 support (0) Izumi Tsutsui
13:41 Re: UDL driver X11 support (2) Jonathan A. Kollasch
13:10 Re: fcntl() F_GETLK semantics vs. test t_vnops.c (0) Alexander Nasonov
13:04 UDL driver X11 support (1) Piotr Adamus
12:31 Re: fcntl() F_GETLK semantics vs. test t_vnops.c (2) J. Hannken-Illjes
11:54 Re: fcntl() F_GETLK semantics vs. test t_vnops.c (0) Tom Spindler
10:13 Re: fcntl() F_GETLK semantics vs. test t_vnops.c (2) Alexander Nasonov
09:37 fcntl() F_GETLK semantics vs. test t_vnops.c (1) J. Hannken-Illjes
08:59 Re: Dutch keymap not imported into NetBSD :p (1) Rhialto
07:24 Re: Multiple device attachments (0) David Laight
07:01 Re: Multiple device attachments (1) David Young
04:30 Re: Dutch keymap not imported into NetBSD :p (0) Jukka Ruohonen
04:27 Dutch keymap not imported into NetBSD :p (2) gilbert . fernandes
02:33 Re: Multiple device attachments (0) Mouse
00:29 Re: Multiple device attachments (0) Paul Goyette
Thu, 21 Jul 2011
21:52 Re: Multiple device attachments (1) Michael
21:24 Re: Multiple device attachments (4) Frank Zerangue
20:50 Re: Multiple device attachments (0) Frank Zerangue
20:19 Re: Multiple device attachments (2) Michael
20:03 Re: Multiple device attachments (0) Mouse
19:44 Multiple device attachments (2) Frank Zerangue
19:10 "strict" weak aliases (1) David Young
04:07 Re: heads up: rename fixed (0) David Holland
Wed, 20 Jul 2011
02:41 re: Shark is broken (0) matthew green
01:50 Re: heads up: rename fixed (1) Eric Haszlakiewicz
Tue, 19 Jul 2011
17:17 Re: Shark is broken (1) David Young
05:38 Shark is broken (1) Michael
03:32 Re: heads up: rename fixed (1) David Holland
Mon, 18 Jul 2011
21:03 Re: heads up: rename fixed (1) Adam Hoka
15:02 Re: heads up: rename fixed (0) David Holland
14:52 Re: heads up: rename fixed (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
14:49 Re: heads up: rename fixed (2) David Holland
13:37 Re: heads up: rename fixed (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
Sat, 16 Jul 2011
20:13 Re: makefs: Seventh Edition(V7) filesystem support (0) Christos Zoulas
12:36 makefs: Seventh Edition(V7) filesystem support. (1) UCHIYAMA Yasushi
09:36 Re: ufs_wapbl_rename (0) David Holland
08:04 Re: ufs_wapbl_rename (1) David Holland
Fri, 15 Jul 2011
22:43 Re: ufs_wapbl_rename (1) David Holland
Thu, 14 Jul 2011
09:01 ufs_wapbl_rename (1) David Holland
07:32 Re: Sun keyboard on i386? (0) Mouse
Wed, 13 Jul 2011
21:40 Re: RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot( (1) Jukka Ruohonen
21:08 Re: RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot( (1) Aleksey Cheusov
20:55 Re: Sun keyboard on i386? (1) Jochen Kunz
20:35 Re: Sun keyboard on i386? (0) Iain Hibbert
20:16 Re: Sun keyboard on i386? (2) Mouse
19:59 Re: Sun keyboard on i386? (0) Mouse
19:20 Re: Sun keyboard on i386? (1) Jochen Kunz
17:15 Re: Sun keyboard on i386? (1) Valeriy E. Ushakov
15:53 Re: Sun keyboard on i386? (1) Mouse
15:14 Re: Sun keyboard on i386? (1) Eduardo Horvath
11:00 Re: Sun keyboard on i386? (0) Valeriy E. Ushakov
10:06 Re: RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot( (0) Jean-Yves Migeon
06:51 Sun keyboard on i386? (3) Mouse
Tue, 12 Jul 2011
04:50 Re: RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot( (2) Taylor R Campbell
01:58 Re: RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot( (0) Brett Lymn
Mon, 11 Jul 2011
07:29 Re: RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot( (1) David Laight
Sun, 10 Jul 2011
19:34 Re: RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot( (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
18:57 Re: RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot( (1) Aleksey Cheusov
17:39 Re: RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot( (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
16:58 Re: RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot( (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
15:43 Re: RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot( (1) Aleksey Cheusov
14:51 Re: RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot( (1) Aleksey Cheusov
13:50 Re: RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot( (1) Jean-Yves Migeon
Sat, 09 Jul 2011
18:39 Re: RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot( (1) Taylor R Campbell
18:09 Re: RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot( (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
17:33 Re: RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot( (0) John Nemeth
14:04 re: RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot( (0) matthew green
10:42 Re: RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot( (0) Iain Hibbert
10:30 Re: RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot( (3) Joerg Sonnenberger
09:27 Re: RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot( (0) Aleksey Cheusov
09:21 Re: RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot( (2) Alan Barrett
09:04 RFC: New security model secmodel_securechroot(9) (4) Aleksey Cheusov
04:05 Re: switching to <sys/bus.h>: the non-trivial patc (0) Masao Uebayashi
03:58 re: switching to <sys/bus.h>: the non-trivial patc (0) matthew green
03:45 Re: switching to <sys/bus.h>: the non-trivial patc (2) David Young
03:22 Re: switching to <sys/bus.h>: the non-trivial patc (1) Matt Thomas
Fri, 08 Jul 2011
22:53 switching to <sys/bus.h>: the non-trivial patches (1) David Young
Thu, 07 Jul 2011
09:11 Make VOP_BWRITE() work with layered fs (0) J. Hannken-Illjes
Mon, 04 Jul 2011
09:42 Re: IOC_CPU_SETSTATE (0) Alexander Nasonov
07:16 Re: IOC_CPU_SETSTATE (1) Jukka Ruohonen
Sun, 03 Jul 2011
21:50 IOC_CPU_SETSTATE (1) Alexander Nasonov
18:52 Re: add DIAGNOSTIC back to GENERIC/INSTALL (0) Manuel Bouyer
17:31 Re: add DIAGNOSTIC back to GENERIC/INSTALL (1) Jukka Ruohonen
17:27 Re: add DIAGNOSTIC back to GENERIC/INSTALL (1) Manuel Bouyer
17:23 Re: add DIAGNOSTIC back to GENERIC/INSTALL (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
16:09 Re: add DIAGNOSTIC back to GENERIC/INSTALL (1) Manuel Bouyer
15:17 Re: add DIAGNOSTIC back to GENERIC/INSTALL (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
Sat, 02 Jul 2011
20:16 Re: LOCKDEBUG panic: lockdebug_alloc: already init (0) J. Hannken-Illjes
16:45 Re: LOCKDEBUG panic: lockdebug_alloc: already init (1) dieter roelants
Fri, 01 Jul 2011
11:53 LOCKDEBUG panic: lockdebug_alloc: already initiali (1) dieter roelants
07:03 Re: [FIXED] diagnostic assertion "anon->an_lock == (0) dieter roelants
06:58 Re: extended attributes and lsextattr/extattr_list (0) David Holland
06:35 [PATCH] Re: extended attributes and lsextattr/exta (0) Emmanuel Dreyfus
04:42 Re: extended attributes and lsextattr/extattr_list (1) Emmanuel Dreyfus
01:13 Re: Query regarding adding physical memory after u (1) Bharat Joshi
01:10 Re: extended attributes and lsextattr/extattr_list (1) YAMAMOTO Takashi
01:07 Re: extended attributes and lsextattr/extattr_list (1) YAMAMOTO Takashi


Page 1 of 2011/07
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]
Home


Mail converted by MHonArc