Re: fs-independent quotas

[Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost>]

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:12:19PM +0200, Hauke Fath wrote:
> At 15:14 Uhr +0200 21.10.2011, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> >> This is bound to cause tremendous confusion.  Can we please change the name
> >> to "fs_quota_entry"?  Consider what will happen when (or if) there is a
> >> "zfs_quota_entry" or an "lfs_quota_entry": it will look to anyone reading
> >> the code as if ufs_quota_entry is specific to the ufs layer and the
> >> filesystems that use it.  Not good.
> >
> >ufs_quota_entry is part of the API now,
> 
> ... not in a formal release.

What he said.  This is the opportunity to change it, even if it requires
a short-term patch for one package in pkgsrc.

Thor