tech-kern by date

Last updated: Sun Aug 04 15:53:09 2013
Messages in reverse chronological order
Timezone is UTC

Page 2 of 2012/01
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]
TimeSubject# followupsFrom
Tue, 31 Jan 2012
21:15 Re: CVS commit: src/sys/external/bsd/drm/dist/bsd- (0) Matthias Drochner
21:03 Re: CVS commit: src/sys/external/bsd/drm/dist/bsd- (0) Lars Heidieker
20:33 Re: CVS commit: src/sys/external/bsd/drm/dist/bsd- (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
20:30 Re: CVS commit: src/sys/external/bsd/drm/dist/bsd- (2) Lars Heidieker
18:44 Re: CVS commit: src/sys/external/bsd/drm/dist/bsd- (1) Matthias Drochner
18:40 Re: CVS commit: src/sys/external/bsd/drm/dist/bsd- (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
18:17 Re: Removing __NetBSD_Prereq__() (0) David Holland
18:05 Re: CVS commit: src/sys/external/bsd/drm/dist/bsd- (1) Matthias Drochner
10:10 draft quota syscall switchover patch (0) David Holland
05:06 Re: extended attributes and lsextattr/extattr_list (1) Emmanuel Dreyfus
03:12 Re: extended attributes and lsextattr/extattr_list (1) YAMAMOTO Takashi
Mon, 30 Jan 2012
17:24 Re: Question about tcp ephemeral ports (0) Olivier MATZ
16:43 Re: Question about tcp ephemeral ports (1) Olivier MATZ
16:13 Re: Question about tcp ephemeral ports (1) Eric Haszlakiewicz
16:11 Re: Question about tcp ephemeral ports (1) Eric Haszlakiewicz
15:54 Re: Question about tcp ephemeral ports (1) Rhialto
15:48 Question about tcp ephemeral ports (2) Olivier MATZ
13:19 malloc(9) alignment (was: Re: CVS commit: src/sy (0) Matthias Drochner
07:57 Re: Question about i386 CDs (bootxx_cd9660/boot-bi (0) Evgeniy Ivanov
06:37 Re: kmem-pool-uvm (0) YAMAMOTO Takashi
Sun, 29 Jan 2012
22:34 Re: Question about i386 CDs (bootxx_cd9660/boot-bi (1) Hubert Feyrer
18:01 Re: Question about i386 CDs (bootxx_cd9660/boot-bi (1) Evgeniy Ivanov
08:00 Re: Question about i386 CDs (bootxx_cd9660/boot-bi (1) Evgeniy Ivanov
Sat, 28 Jan 2012
23:35 Re: Implementing mount_union(8) into vfs (for -o u (0) Alistair Crooks
21:33 Re: Implementing mount_union(8) into vfs (for -o u (1) Julian Fagir
19:58 Re: Implementing mount_union(8) into vfs (for -o u (1) Alistair Crooks
19:47 Re: Implementing mount_union(8) into vfs (for -o u (1) Alan Barrett
16:20 malloc(9) -> kmem(9) for wapbl (0) Lars Heidieker
13:01 Implementing mount_union(8) into vfs (for -o union (1) Julian Fagir
09:00 Re: Question about i386 CDs (bootxx_cd9660/boot-bi (1) Hubert Feyrer
Fri, 27 Jan 2012
22:56 Question about i386 CDs (bootxx_cd9660/boot-big.fs (1) Evgeniy Ivanov
18:34 Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: kmem-pool-uvm (0) Lars Heidieker
02:51 Re: RFC: import of posix_spawn GSoC results (0) YAMAMOTO Takashi
Thu, 26 Jan 2012
15:40 Re: MI non-interlocked atomic ops? (1) YAMAMOTO Takashi
15:31 Re: RFC: import of posix_spawn GSoC results (0) Joerg Sonnenberger
15:23 Re: RFC: import of posix_spawn GSoC results (1) Martin Husemann
15:16 Re: RFC: import of posix_spawn GSoC results (2) Joerg Sonnenberger
15:11 Re: RFC: import of posix_spawn GSoC results (1) YAMAMOTO Takashi
04:39 Re: updated patch Re: buffer cache & ufs changes ( (0) David Holland
04:27 Re: updated patch Re: buffer cache & ufs changes ( (0) David Holland
Wed, 25 Jan 2012
23:30 Re: updated patch Re: buffer cache & ufs changes ( (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
22:40 Re: MI non-interlocked atomic ops? (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
18:37 Re: Adding an option to avoid SIGPIPE for all file (0) Matthew Mondor
18:32 Re: Adding an option to avoid SIGPIPE for all file (0) David Holland
17:25 Re: Adding an option to avoid SIGPIPE for all file (1) Steven Bellovin
17:21 Re: Adding an option to avoid SIGPIPE for all file (0) Steven Bellovin
14:26 Re: RFC: import of posix_spawn GSoC results (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
13:14 Re: RFC: import of posix_spawn GSoC results (1) YAMAMOTO Takashi
12:35 Re: RFC: import of posix_spawn GSoC results (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
11:50 Re: RFC: import of posix_spawn GSoC results (2) Martin Husemann
03:33 Re: CVS commit: src (0) YAMAMOTO Takashi
03:33 Re: Adding an option to avoid SIGPIPE for all file (0) YAMAMOTO Takashi
Tue, 24 Jan 2012
23:11 Re: Adding an option to avoid SIGPIPE for all file (0) Rhialto
22:46 Re: Possible incorrect usage of STACKALIGN in kern (0) David Holland
22:31 Re: Possible incorrect usage of STACKALIGN in kern (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
22:13 Re: Possible incorrect usage of STACKALIGN in kern (1) David Holland
22:09 Re: Possible incorrect usage of STACKALIGN in kern (0) Joerg Sonnenberger
21:53 Re: Possible incorrect usage of STACKALIGN in kern (1) Matthew Mondor
21:34 Re: Adding an option to avoid SIGPIPE for all file (1) Michael van Elst
21:32 Re: Possible incorrect usage of STACKALIGN in kern (1) Stephen M. Rumble
21:04 Re: Possible incorrect usage of STACKALIGN in kern (0) Christos Zoulas
20:55 Re: Possible incorrect usage of STACKALIGN in kern (2) Joerg Sonnenberger
20:38 Re: Possible incorrect usage of STACKALIGN in kern (0) Martin Husemann
20:30 Re: Possible incorrect usage of STACKALIGN in kern (2) Matthew Mondor
20:25 Re: Possible incorrect usage of STACKALIGN in kern (0) Martin Husemann
20:01 Re: Possible incorrect usage of STACKALIGN in kern (2) Martin Husemann
19:23 Re: MI non-interlocked atomic ops? (0) David Laight
19:21 Possible incorrect usage of STACKALIGN in kern_exe (2) Paul Fleischer
19:05 Re: Adding an option to avoid SIGPIPE for all file (1) Christos Zoulas
17:19 Re: Adding an option to avoid SIGPIPE for all file (1) David Holland
17:16 MI non-interlocked atomic ops? (2) David Young
13:37 Re: Adding an option to avoid SIGPIPE for all file (1) Christos Zoulas
13:13 Re: NetBSD on current AMD motherboards (1) Edgar Fuß
08:29 Re: Adding an option to avoid SIGPIPE for all file (1) David Laight
04:07 Re: Adding an option to avoid SIGPIPE for all file (0) David Holland

Page 2 of 2012/01
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]
Home

Mail converted by MHonArc