tech-kern by date

Last updated: Sun Aug 04 15:53:09 2013
Messages in reverse chronological order
Timezone is UTC

Page 1 of 2012/05
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]

TimeSubject# followupsFrom
Thu, 31 May 2012
20:34 Re: Should kqueue descriptors work outsid of the c (0) Matthew Mondor
18:40 Re: Should kqueue descriptors work outsid of the c (2) Matthew Mondor
18:09 Re: link-sets in modules (0) Matthew Mondor
17:46 Rump FS throughput (1) Matthew Mondor
15:37 Re: selectively disabling atime updates? (1) Paul Goyette
15:35 Re: selectively disabling atime updates? (2) Matthias Kretschmer
14:42 Re: selectively disabling atime updates? (1) Edgar Fuß
14:38 Re: Should kqueue descriptors work outsid of the c (1) Mouse
14:32 Re: selectively disabling atime updates? (2) Matthias Kretschmer
14:23 Re: selectively disabling atime updates? (1) Edgar Fuß
12:30 Re: selectively disabling atime updates? (1) J. Hannken-Illjes
12:14 selectively disabling atime updates? (1) Edgar Fuß
11:56 Re: Fixing pool_cache_invalidate(9), final step (1) Jean-Yves Migeon
11:23 Re: kern/46494 (cgd on 4K sector disk) (1) Roland C. Dowdeswell
11:10 Re: mmap, ENOMEM and setrlimit (0) Joerg Sonnenberger
11:09 kern/46494 (cgd on 4K sector disk) (1) Jan Danielsson
10:13 Should kqueue descriptors work outsid of the creat (1) Martin Husemann
07:39 Re: mmap, ENOMEM and setrlimit (0) Emmanuel Dreyfus
05:52 Re: mmap, ENOMEM and setrlimit (2) Emmanuel Dreyfus
Wed, 30 May 2012
20:44 Re: Fixing pool_cache_invalidate(9), final step (1) Lars Heidieker
16:50 Re: Fixing pool_cache_invalidate(9), final step (1) Jean-Yves Migeon
04:03 Re: link-sets in modules (0) Jukka Ruohonen
Tue, 29 May 2012
22:01 Re: link-sets in modules (1) Paul Goyette
21:47 Re: link-sets in modules (1) David Laight
21:34 Re: Fixing pool_cache_invalidate(9), final step (1) Lars Heidieker
19:05 Fixing pool_cache_invalidate(9), final step (1) Jean-Yves Migeon
17:26 Re: link-sets in modules (1) Matt Thomas
17:00 Re: link-sets in modules (1) Paul Goyette
16:05 Re: link-sets in modules (1) Matt Thomas
Mon, 28 May 2012
19:38 Re: link-sets in modules (1) Paul Goyette
19:02 Re: link-sets in modules (1) David Laight
18:38 Re: link-sets in modules (1) Paul Goyette
18:24 Re: link-sets in modules (1) David Laight
13:51 Re: link-sets in modules (2) Paul Goyette
08:45 Anyone using usbmuxd with NetBSD? (0) Brian Buhrow
06:51 link-sets in modules (1) David Laight
Fri, 25 May 2012
16:46 Re: raw/block device disc troughput (0) Eduardo Horvath
09:53 Re: raw/block device disc troughput (1) Edgar Fuß
09:50 Re: raw/block device disc troughput (0) Edgar Fuß
Thu, 24 May 2012
20:54 Re: lwp resource limit (0) David Laight
18:18 Re: raw/block device disc troughput (0) Eduardo Horvath
18:10 Re: raw/block device disc troughput (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
17:45 MPT inefficency (was: raw/block device disc trough (0) Edgar Fuß
17:38 Re: raw/block device disc troughput (0) Edgar Fuß
17:31 Re: raw/block device disc troughput (3) Eduardo Horvath
17:21 Re: raw/block device disc troughput (1) Edgar Fuß
17:16 Re: raw/block device disc troughput (1) Mouse
17:13 Re: raw/block device disc troughput (0) Edgar Fuß
17:00 Re: raw/block device disc troughput (2) Thor Lancelot Simon
16:59 Re: raw/block device disc troughput (1) Eduardo Horvath
16:48 Re: raw/block device disc troughput (1) Mouse
16:42 Re: raw/block device disc troughput (0) Paul Goyette
16:26 raw/block device disc troughput (4) Edgar Fuß
15:31 Re: mlockall() and small memory systems (0) Eduardo Horvath
14:14 Re: lwp resource limit (1) Christos Zoulas
12:52 Re: lwp resource limit (1) Christos Zoulas
09:07 Re: lwp resource limit (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
06:55 Re: lwp resource limit (1) YAMAMOTO Takashi
Wed, 23 May 2012
23:37 lwp resource limit (4) Christos Zoulas
23:12 Re: mlockall() and small memory systems (2) Martin Husemann
18:20 Re: mlockall() and small memory systems (1) David Laight
16:32 Re: mlockall() and small memory systems (0) Martin Husemann
16:30 Re: mlockall() and small memory systems (1) Izumi Tsutsui
16:15 mlockall() and small memory systems (2) Martin Husemann
Tue, 22 May 2012
21:20 Re: Breaking out of the emulation dir (0) Duncan McEwan
16:22 Re: Breaking out of the emulation dir (1) David Holland
09:51 Re: Breaking out of the emulation dir (1) Edgar Fuß
07:59 Re: Breaking out of the emulation dir (1) David Holland
04:44 Re: "bad tag" message (0) Christos Zoulas
Mon, 21 May 2012
21:01 Re: Breaking out of the emulation dir (1) Edgar Fuß
17:52 Re: Breaking out of the emulation dir (0) Brian Buhrow
17:32 Re: Breaking out of the emulation dir (1) David Holland
16:16 Re: Breaking out of the emulation dir (0) Eric Haszlakiewicz
13:47 Re: "bad tag" message (1) Edgar Fuß
13:44 Breaking out of the emulation dir (2) Edgar Fuß
13:39 Re: "bad tag" message (1) Christos Zoulas
13:36 "bad tag" message (1) Edgar Fuß
06:36 Re: quotacheck on 6.0_BETA (0) David Holland
05:53 Re: default grace time for new quota (was: quotach (0) David Holland
Sun, 20 May 2012
21:51 Re: libquota units (0) Edgar Fuß
21:45 Re: quotacheck on 6.0_BETA (1) Edgar Fuß
21:40 default grace time for new quota (was: quotacheck (1) Edgar Fuß
16:44 Re: quotacheck on 6.0_BETA (2) David Holland
16:35 Re: libquota units (1) David Holland
16:09 libquota units (1) Edgar Fuß
10:42 Re: quotacheck on 6.0_BETA (1) Edgar Fuß
Sat, 19 May 2012
17:23 Re: quotacheck on 6.0_BETA (1) David Holland
17:16 Re: accessing another process' resource limits (0) Edgar Fuß
16:58 Re: accessing another process' resource limits (1) Mouse
16:51 accessing another process' resource limits (1) Edgar Fuß
Fri, 18 May 2012
22:55 Re: Allocating inodes (was: choosing the file syst (0) Mouse
22:51 Re: Allocating inodes (was: choosing the file syst (0) Edgar Fuß
21:37 Re: Allocating inodes (was: choosing the file syst (2) Edgar Fuß
18:32 Re: choosing the file system block size (0) Mouse
17:40 quotacheck on 6.0_BETA (1) Edgar Fuß
16:59 Re: Allocating inodes (was: choosing the file syst (1) David Laight
12:42 Allocating inodes (was: choosing the file system b (1) Edgar Fuß
12:38 Re: allocating files with indirect blocks (0) Edgar Fuß
12:35 Re: choosing the file system block size (1) Edgar Fuß
07:54 Re: Crashes in uaudio (0) Julian Coleman
Wed, 16 May 2012
05:30 Re: choosing the file system block size (1) Mouse
Tue, 15 May 2012
17:54 Re: choosing the file system block size (1) Edgar Fuß
16:57 Re: Editing (new) quota for a new user (1) David Holland
Mon, 14 May 2012
15:58 Editing (new) quota for a new user (1) Edgar Fuß
15:55 Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size (0) Eduardo Horvath
15:11 Re: allocating files with indirect blocks (was: ch (1) Robert Elz
14:50 Re: allocating files with indirect blocks (was: ch (0) Mouse
11:35 allocating files with indirect blocks (was: choosi (1) Edgar Fuß
10:33 Re: Crashes in uaudio (1) Julian Coleman
Sat, 12 May 2012
14:27 Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size (0) Edgar Fuß
14:25 Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size (1) Edgar Fuß
Fri, 11 May 2012
22:29 Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size (0) Greg Oster
22:20 Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size (1) Edgar Fuß
17:33 Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size (1) Greg Oster
17:22 Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size (1) Eduardo Horvath
15:50 Re: choosing the file system block size (2) Mouse
15:09 Re: choosing the file system block size (1) Edgar Fuß
15:05 Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size (2) Edgar Fuß
14:45 Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size (1) Greg Oster
14:35 Re: choosing the file system block size (3) Mouse
13:42 Crashes in uaudio (1) Julian Coleman
10:47 Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size (1) Edgar Fuß
10:21 choosing the file system block size (1) Edgar Fuß
Thu, 10 May 2012
19:40 Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size (0) Greg Oster
18:05 Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size (2) Thor Lancelot Simon
17:47 Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size (2) Greg Oster
17:23 Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size (2) Thor Lancelot Simon
17:15 Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size (2) Greg Oster
16:59 Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size (1) Edgar Fuß
15:55 Re: RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size (1) Greg Oster
15:46 RAIDframe performance vs. stripe size (1) Edgar Fuß
Tue, 08 May 2012
21:11 Re: O->A loan (0) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
Mon, 07 May 2012
00:58 Re: O->A loan (1) YAMAMOTO Takashi
Sat, 05 May 2012
16:50 Re: Broken builds (0) David Holland
09:45 Broken builds (1) Martin Husemann
02:52 Re: Thinking about "branes" for netbsd... (0) Darren Reed
Fri, 04 May 2012
21:06 Re: watching dynamic device attachment? (0) Thomas Klausner
16:01 Re: broken puffs atf (0) Emmanuel Dreyfus
15:38 Re: re. SMP networking (0) girish gulawani
15:22 Re: re. SMP networking (1) haad
15:15 re. SMP networking (1) girish gulawani
15:10 broken puffs atf (1) Emmanuel Dreyfus
14:52 Re: watching dynamic device attachment? (1) Eric Haszlakiewicz
07:27 Re: watching dynamic device attachment? (1) Martin Husemann
05:06 Re: watching dynamic device attachment? (0) Michael van Elst
01:39 Re: watching dynamic device attachment? (1) Paul Goyette
01:35 Re: watching dynamic device attachment? (1) Mouse
01:23 Re: watching dynamic device attachment? (1) Paul Goyette
01:17 Re: watching dynamic device attachment? (1) Mouse
00:10 Re: watching dynamic device attachment? (1) Paul Goyette
00:01 watching dynamic device attachment? (2) Mouse
Thu, 03 May 2012
18:25 Re: Thinking about "branes" for netbsd... (0) David Holland
07:49 Re: Thinking about "branes" for netbsd... (0) Dennis Ferguson
Wed, 02 May 2012
06:49 Re: Thinking about "branes" for netbsd... (2) Mouse
05:02 Thinking about "branes" for netbsd... (2) Darren Reed
Tue, 01 May 2012
07:25 Re: ENOATTR vs ENODATA (0) Emmanuel Dreyfus
07:19 Re: ENOATTR vs ENODATA (1) Martin Husemann
02:54 Re: ENOATTR vs ENODATA (1) Jean-Yves Migeon
02:16 Re: ENOATTR vs ENODATA (1) Emmanuel Dreyfus


Page 1 of 2012/05
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]
Home


Mail converted by MHonArc