Re: Quota on tmpfs

[Matthew Mondor <mm_lists%pulsar-zone.net@localhost>]

On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 08:03:42 +0000
David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:

> I believe the situation with both mfs and lfs is that some pieces of
> the support are in place but not others. It was clear when hacking up
> the code that neither had actually been tried by anyone in a long,
> long time...

I admit myself not having tried LFS again after the advent of WAPBL,
and only having used MFS to boot small custom userlands using
crunchgen(1) long ago (floppy disks :)
-- 
Matt