Re: [PATCH] fexecve

To: tech-kern%NetBSD.org@localhost, tech-security%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fexecve
From: Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:04:04 -0500 (EST)

>> It always could, just not with exec()-family calls.  Did you read
>> the points you didn't quote about script interpreters and VMs?
> What script interpreters?  What VMs?  Why would I include one in such
> an environment?

Why would you include a call to fexecve()?  You need cooperation from
the chrooted process either way.

/~\ The ASCII                             Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML                mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

References:
- [PATCH] fexecve
  - From: Emmanuel Dreyfus
- Re: [PATCH] fexecve
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: [PATCH] fexecve
  - From: Mouse
- Re: [PATCH] fexecve
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: [PATCH] fexecve
  - From: Mouse
- Re: [PATCH] fexecve
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] fexecve
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] fexecve
Previous by Thread: Re: [PATCH] fexecve
Next by Thread: Re: [PATCH] fexecve
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index