Re: MACHINE_ARCH on NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current

[Matt Thomas <matt%3am-software.com@localhost>]

On Oct 26, 2013, at 5:45 AM, Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost> 
wrote:

> By static MACHINE_ARCH, or dynamic sysctl(3)?
> If dynamic sysctl(3) is prefered, which node?

hw.machine_arch

which has been defined for a long long time.